This is the third of a four post series. You can read the first two posts here:
Removing variation and waste from the process and balancing the process to optimize the constraint will improve the operation. However, where many businesses struggle in Operations Improvement is in realizing these improvements. For example if a simple manufacturing line scheduled the line to produce 10 widgets per hour, then some good process improvements were implemented, but the business continued to schedule the line to produce 10 widgets per hour, was the improvement really worth all the effort?
Pillar 2 – Management Tools aims to attack this and a few other key concepts.
In short, management tools are the tools that managers use to plan ahead, track in real time, and measure past performance of the process.
How To Organize Management Tools
The clearest way to think about Management Tools is to consider 7 buckets of tools:
- Business / Strategic Direction – High level forward looking constraints and plans of the business. These tools typically comes in the form of annual budgets, capital plans, business objectives, etc. These tools are planning in nature and generally look out a year or more.
- Forecast – Forward looking estimate of the amount of business that the company expects to achieve. Forecast time frames range from weekly to annually, and vary in specificity and structure. Forecasts can estimate the dollar revenue, the number of units, or the number of operations activities expected to be required based on sales of the company’s products.
- Performance Plan – Forward looking translation of performance requirements that a company must achieve to accomplish the Forecast within the constraints of the Business Direction. For example if a company forecasts sales of 100 widgets for a month, and the budget (business direction) calls for operations costs of $5,000, the performance plan for the month should plan operations to achieve cost per unit of $50.
- Schedule – A discrete plan of who, what, and when the business will perform the operations required to achieve the Performance Plan. For example, if the cost per unit expectation is $50, the materials to produce the unit cost $5, and the wage for the staff that produces the unit is $10/hr, the schedule should plan for staff to spend no more than 4.5 hours on a unit. ($50 cost per unit expectation – $5 material cost = $45 per unit available for wages / $10 per hour wage rate = 4.5 hours)
- Operations Control – This is the intersection of planning ahead and measuring the past – it is the tool that allows a manager to know RIGHT NOW if they are on track to achieve the Schedule (which was built to achieve the Performance Plan… which was based on achieving the Forecast and Business Direction)
- Results Measurement – Backwards looking measurement of performance. These tools allow managers to identify variances and lend to operations improvements by identifying the parts of the process that are not achieving the Schedule… Performance Plan… Forecast… Business Direction.
- Continuous Improvement Loop – A set of tools tracking performance variances and linking operational activities to financial outcomes.
I’ve worked with ~60 businesses, and I have yet to find a single one that comes even remotely close to having a full suite of Management Tools that link clearly from top to bottom. For that matter, only a handful of those businesses link more than 2 of the 6 buckets in a manner such that managers are able to use the tools thoroughly.
So you ask, how do we improve operations using Management Tools? [click to continue…]
{ 0 comments }






Media Spin or Irrational Business?
by Rick Maher on January 31, 2010
I fell hook line and sinker for the title of this article: Steve Jobs Hates Eric Schmidt
Unfortunately I think the author of the article did too…
The article alleges that Apple may switch the iPhone’s search provider from Google to Microsoft because of a personal distaste of Steve Jobs (Apple CEO) toward Google – or more specifically towards Eric Schmidt (Google’s CEO).
The article breezes over the point that Microsoft may be willing to pay Apple more than Google which would be infinitely more compelling of a reason.
Both options strike me as curious though – seeing as while Apple and Google are increasingly becoming competitors with Google’s foray into mobile phone devices / operating systems, but let’s not forget – Microsoft and Apple aren’t exactly best buddies either…
{ 0 comments }